In Barringer’s article on race and empire
in Pre-Raphaelite art, I found William Holman Hunt’s comment on the connection
between artists and ethnographers particularly interesting. To paraphrase, his
comment was that artists should be like ethnographers, bringing knowledge about
the world back home. Barringer identifies this distinction as a strict
opposition between the West and the East. As an anthropology major, it is
interesting to see these views portrayed in art, as so many anthropologists
mirrored the view of Hunt and the majority of the British during colonial rule
in the nineteenth century. For example, Malinowski, a British Anthropologist,
did his fieldwork in the Trobriand in the early 20th century. Like Hunt, his
diary was published and his true colors were exposed as racist and sexist.
After these feelings were exposed, his credibility is what came into question.
For the anthropologist, most disregard Malinowski as his diary proved him to be
unhappy and his judgement skewed. It is difficult to trust someone’s objective
study when they have these ideas that the natives are ‘primitive’ and ‘savage’.
Hunt was also frightened by being in a new place, and becoming the foreigner.
However, in the case of Hunt it only seemed to strengthen the symbolism of the
painting. Although Hunt may not be seen as an ethnographer and bringing the
knowledge of a different culture to England, his painting has distinct
characteristics that can show some of the views of this time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58a88/58a88dab1d8510889e51defc55314c4cb27af324" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment