Friday, October 31, 2014

Amanda Dailey's Blog Post 1


Rossetti and the Mythological Female
            As a double major in Art History and Classics, I’m always interested when the two fields (and my two loves) come together and how that merger seems to change over time. In the mid- to late-nineteenth century, one can find figures from classical mythology among Pre-Raphaelite works and I find that fascinating – perhaps most notably because when one thinks of the art of classical antiquity (thinking especially of Greek architecture and sculpture), one thinks of an art in pursuit of the ideal, working toward a perfection of form. The Pre-Raphaelites, on the other hand, rejected the notion of the ideal and sought truth in the world around them (most adamantly in their earliest stage), yet they continued this tradition of borrowing and adapting for their overall movement and later, their own particular styles.

                                         
                  Rossetti, Proserpine, 1874              Rossetti, Mnemosyne, 1875-1881

            An example of this can be seen in the art of Rossetti, some of whose later female figures – painted from real women – are inspired by Greek and Roman myth. Two pieces we’ve looked at in class (which set me on this train of thought), Mnemosyne and Proserpine, are both modeled by Jane Morris. She was a striking woman, beautiful in her own way and not necessarily so by Victorian or conventional standards – a common trait among Pre-Raphaelite models. Under Rossetti’s hand, previously idealized and in some cases practically uniform facial features of the past become unique and recognizable, and a living, breathing muse of the nineteenth century is inserted into an ancient context as an immortal goddess. This “doubling effect,” as Prettejohn terms it (page 205), gives each piece its impact.

                                                         Portrait painting of a young woman with golden hair and clothing
                                          Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Helen of Troy, 1863

            Similarly, Rossetti depicts another contemporary mortal as the most (in)famous and beautiful mortal of antiquity. Helen of Troy, a piece I don’t believe we’ve seen yet in class, was modeled by Annie Miller. In the painting, she wears a necklace with a firebrand, a symbol of her lover Paris, while Troy burns in the background. According to the Walker Art Gallery website, “ἑλένας, ἕλανδρος, ἑλέπτολις,” a line from Aeschylus’ Agamemnon that I’ve recently had to translate in my Greek class, is actually inscribed on the back of the painting – “destroyer of ships, destroyer of men, destroyer of cities.” Again there is a focus on the individual woman in a sort of dual representation, a real and realistically imperfect face as the face that “launched a thousand ships.”
            Rossetti’s choice then in painting these women as mythological figures is interesting. There is a level of Pre-Raphaelite truth, as Rossetti paints the model(s) before him and includes their distinctive features – yet because they are elevated in position within a mythological context, (and perhaps due in part to Rossetti’s romantic interest in both women,) one can see a possible attempt to create a kind of grounded ideal, arguably a modern and far more personal adaptation of the efforts of antiquity. For me, this potential connection between fields adds a new depth to these pieces and makes them all the more fun to study!

Jennifer William's Blog Post 1

Labor versus Content: Conflicting Moralities in The Awakening Conscience
Jennifer Williams
Art History 407

      This semester, I have begun my first ventures into oil paintings. I had painted before in high school art classes, crafting with acrylic paint, and using experimental media in a painting-like process. I thought that these experiences would prepare me for working with oils; I was wrong. Oil paints, specifically the individual pigments, have unique characters that require hours of study simply to learn how to handle. Yellow pigments are translucent and require multiple layers, with days of drying in between, in order to build opacity.  Burnt Sienna has a heavy, viscous body that requires painstaking effort to create a smooth, even layer of color.  The majority of the labor of oil painting is not translating an image onto the canvas, but rather, the mechanics of the transformation of an unpredictable chemical paste, (also known as paint), into something that can be used to create a desired result.  One must consider the ratio of colors that are mixed to create a new hue, the color of the ground onto which the paint is placed, the viscosity and opacity of the paint, the texture of the canvas, and the size of the brush, as well as other factors which I'm sure that I am currently unaware of, given my limited experience in this medium.  All I can say is that right now, I definitely empathize with Williams Holman Hunt's description of Rossetti's frustration with painting still lifes, in that he found this “discipline... so abhorrent that it had tormented his soul beyond power of endurance”[1]
Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Bottles
My still life painting 2014
       Despite many challenges, I would still recommend this experience to other students interested in Art History— not necessarily because it is enjoyable, but because it has significantly increased my understanding of the modes of production for these works of art. In examining the intense, hyper-detailed approach of the Pre-Raphaelite artists, I find that I am able to apply my new understanding of the physical effort of painting to not only appreciate such minute details for their aesthetic value, but also for the skill of the painter to be able to manipulate paint so precisely and for the artists’ patience in waiting for each layer of paint to dry in order to achieve such detail.

       In Victorian society, such intense and painstaking labor was equated to moral value, and the hours spent on a painting made the work valuable[2].  However, the taboo representation of a fallen woman within William Holman Hunt's The Awakening Conscience creates a conflict with the moral value of the labor present in the work.
      One can see in this work the extreme amount of details put into every aspect of this work, such as the interior of the room, the embroidery of the garments, and the reflections in the mirror. (Based on my current speed of painting, I would estimate that this would take me several years to even attempt). While one would expect that such laborious process would be celebrated, this painting was, rather, criticized as vulgar due to its content[3].  The image of the fallen woman in Victorian society was seen as an urban problem, and it was inappropriate to represent such a woman  in fine art.  The lavishly decorated interior would have immediately signaled to a 19th century viewer that this was not the dwelling place of a proper Victorian lady, but rather a gaudy apartment paid for by the man with whom this woman was engaging in an improper relationship[4].
William Holman Hunt, The Awakening Conscience, 1853-4

     I find this contradiction interesting in that the labor put into a painting or work of art was equated to moral value, but the image  which this labor produced in  The Awakening Conscience was criticized for its immoral content. This contradiction of Victorian values can be seen in many other Pre-Raphaelite works, such as John Everett Millais' The Hireling Shepherd or Dante Gabriel Rossetti's Found.  This tension between the value of the arduous process of creating the work and the controversial content that is represented contributes an interesting perspective into the interpretation of Pre-Raphaelite art in Victorian society.  



1.    William Holman Hunt, Pre-Raphaelitism and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Vol. 1 (New York: Macmillan, 1905), 108.
2.   Lecture notes, 16 September 2014
3.   Elizabeth Prettejohn, The Art of the Pre-Raphaelites (Millbank, London: Tate Publishing, 2000), 94.
4. Ibid.

Image links:
http://nonahyytinen.com/part-2-enter-dante-gabriel-rossetti-and-the-other-preraphaelites
http://uploads1.wikiart.org/images/william-holman-hunt/the-awakening-conscience-1853.jpg

Brittany Holznagel's Blog Post #1


Lady Lilith, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, 
1873, Oil on Canvas.

While working on my formal analysis for the painting Lady Lilith by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, I was introduced to the idea of the femme fatale in Victorian culture. Although this character type has been used since ancient texts, the use of it during the Victorian period was specified by the strict gender expectations of women at the time, as well as the anxiety over the changing gender roles of women in society. Gender issues have always been something that fascinates me, so I decided to pursue this topic a little further.
Sarah Michelle Gellar, 
Cruel Intentions, 1999.

Angelina Jolie, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, 2005.
I wanted to look more into how the femme fatale character is portrayed in culture today, and what causes the portrayal of these women as such. The femme fatales of cinema are the best examples to examine, since we can understand the personality and actions of these women thoroughly, rather than strictly their setting and their physical looks. Some examples that come to mind are Sarah Michelle Gellar in Cruel Intentions, Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct, and Angelina Jolie in a plethora of movies. These contemporary femme fatales are much of what their Victorian counterparts were. They use their sexuality as a form of power, and seduce individuals to get what they desire. They are manipulative and emotionless, and in some cases, fatal. Some of the femme fatales created portrayed by the Pre-Raphaelites, such as Lady Lilith and Venus Verticordia, have background stories that create a strong tie to their contemporary counterparts, but that is not true for all. A major difference of the modern femme fatales is their place in society. Many of their Victorian counterparts are fictional or mythological characters, whose single role is to seduce and take advantage. They are often shown in little to no clothing, or clothing that would be unacceptable in public, and are in the act of seduction. The contemporary femmes are often placed within society, and have to hide their sexuality and deceitfulness to conform in public. This could be due to a need for modern society to create another layer of deceptiveness for these femme fatales. Revealing dress and sexuality are not as significant of an issue as they were during the Victorian period.
Venus Verticordia, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, 
1868, Oil on Canvas.

The distinction created by societies on the portrayal of women in media is a topic that I would like to look into further. I would like to know what the reasons are for the interest in the femme fatale character, as well as other types that are pervasive in our culture that were also used by the Pre-Raphaelites. The aspects that I touched on barely scrape the surface of the comparison between Victorian and modern femme fatales. 














Images: 
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4364544/tt0356910
http://www.dorsetmuseums.co.uk/russell-cotes-art-gallery-and-museum

Kelsey Fuller's Blog Post 1



While exploring my research paper topic I happened upon a pen and ink illustration by John Everett Millais from 1853 titled Virtue and Vice. I was immediately struck by the potential relationship between this illustration and William Holman Hunt’s oil painting The Awakening Conscience, also from 1853. What little research there is regarding Virtue and Vice revolves mainly around the idea that the woman depicted as struggling between earning her living as a seamstress or entering the sex industry. Hunt’s The Awakening Consciousness, on the other hand, is well known to be a depiction of a kept mistress experiencing a spiritual revelation, although it is unclear whether her potential redemption will be realized. 

I found myself wondering whether Millais and Hunt had both experimented with the common theme of temptation, although in quite different manners. Hunt appears to be exploring the temptation of redemption while Millais presents a scene of the temptation of a fallen lifestyle. This juxtaposition is furthered by the contrasting settings of each image. Hunt’s oil painting gives the viewer a look into a gaudy, over-decorated apartment in typical Pre-Raphaelite detail. Millais on the other hand presents the sparse, drab interior of a struggling, poor seamstress completed only in pen and ink. Ironically, neither of the women depicted are happy with their lives and could arguably be coveting that of the other. 

While there does appear to be some sort of parallel theme between the two works, I was unable to find any significant academic founding for the claim. Unfortunately, I could not find any correspondence from Millais in regard to Vice and Virtue, most likely because it did not reach fruition past the pen and ink illustration. I would be curious to learn whether Millais was responding to Hunt’s work or if it was the other way around. Given what has been gleaned about Hunt’s temperament and ego from his journal I’m quite confident that Hunt would claim to be the inception point of Millais’ illustration.

Image was pulled from these websites: http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/sugar-salt-and-curdled-milk-millais-and-synthetic-subject; http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/hunt-the-awakening-conscience-t02075
 
John Everett Millais, Virtue and Vice, 1853, pen and ink.


William Holman Hunt, The Awakening Conscience, 1853, oil paint on canvas.