Friday, October 31, 2014

Sam Selsky's Blog Post: Victorian Culture in Contemporary Body Art


Building off of my contribution of a Rossetti tattoo in our class discussion of Pre-Raphaelite influence on today’s culture, I decided to do more research. Upon looking for Pre-Raphaelite tattoos, I discovered that there was a large subculture of Victorian modes in body art. Several of these tattoos feature Rossetti-esque aesthetic women. Most have long flowing red hair with thick lips and dramatic eyes. The tattoos I found also include an abundance of flowers or jewelry, both widely used in Rossetti’s aesthetic paintings. I find this exceptionally interesting because Pre-Raphaelite paintings are so notoriously detailed. Tattoos can be detailed, but a balance must be achieved between detail and size so the tattoo ages well and maintains its integrity. I also found it interesting how often the Rossetti aesthetic is used, compared to the art of the other Pre- Raphaelite painters. In my research, I could only find body art of Rossetti’s portraits. I believe that this may be because Rossetti had developed such a strong female type for his paintings, so viewers of the tattoo would still be able to recognize that the tattoo was Pre-Raphaelite without having to know the exact painting. I found my images on blogs and Pinterest boards, both used to express a form of self-representation. Even though I do not have any tattoos myself, I am quite intrigued by them. I think the stories that lie behind the tattoos are often very heartfelt and genuine. It is such a large commitment to have something permanently tattooed on your body. I admire the people with the decisiveness and bravery to make that commitment.


Image Sources:

Thursday, October 30, 2014

The Embroider of Female Sexuality (Blog Post 1)



 Daria Modrzanska

            There is a reoccurring theme in several William Holman Hunt paintings between female figures and entangled threads. Works such as The Awakening Conscience (1853) and The Lady of Shalott (1905) demonstrate Hunt’s intrigue in the presentation of knotted threads alongside “fallen” women. By no means coincidental, tangled threads in Hunt’s paintings are depicted with immoral and unchaste females who are themselves entangled in webs of sexual impurity.

         Along with Hunt’s pictorial association between femininity and threads, women have long been identified with textiles through the “woman’s arts” of weaving, quilting, and embroidering. Regarded as a suitable past-time activity for Victorian women, “Fancy-Work” perpetuated the notion of the female’s household space and her domestic role in society. For that reason, the entanglement of thread in Hunt’s paintings can be interpreted as the rejection of the craft, and thus the female’s desertion of her ascribed role in Victorian life. Despite this, Handmade Meaning (2010-2011), an exhibition of Victorian craftwork alongside contemporary “crafted” art at the James Watrous Gallery, explored the significance of Victorian craft as a means of “self-expression, self-reliance, and community building” for women at the time. While craftwork implied female’s leisurely domestic activity, it simultaneously provided a device for the empowerment of the female voice during the 19th century.  


               Still, does the dialogue between threads, female sexuality, and the female voice continue into contemporary society? Artist Mo Morgan interlaces these elements in her collection Feminist Embroidery­- traditionally adorned handcrafted embroidery inlaid with bold feminist phrases, such as “gender was never binary.” Morgan attempts to disrupt the passivity associated with women’s fabric art by applying hard-hitting mantras and empowering the female voice. Particularly thought provoking is the comparison between Hunt and Morgan and their respective manifestations of thread and femininity in art. Hunt employs thread to define woman’s sexuality- be it in the retention of woman’s moral and domestic role or in the symbolism of woman’s dissolute sexuality through entangled thread. Morgan, on the other hand, utilizes thread-literally through embroidery- to express the female’s control over her own sexuality.                              
                                  

More Information on Mo Morgan’s Work:
More Information on Handmade Meaning Exhibit:


Aubrey's Blog Post # 1

“That Oriental man,” was how my Grandmother referred to our waiter.
            “Nana, that’s kind of a politically incorrect term,” I had to tell her. “Most people use the word ‘Asian’ now.” For someone who had been around the world and back, she was extremely shocked. She had absolutely no idea.
            I explained to her that Oriental was nowadays used to refer to rugs or decorative artistic pieces, and only sometimes food. I also explained where the term came from, which she found the most interesting, but also the most eye opening. Oriental is a term that has never accurately described a race, or group of people native to Asia. Instead, it describes the manufactured idea of what the countries, which fell outside of continental Europe, were, created by Europeans who often exploited them.
            The Orange Chicken I love to eat at the food court staple Panda Express, is not a product of true Chinese Cuisine, but rather a reflection of what American people like, and also want to believe is authentic Chinese Cuisine. I’ve learned about true Chinese Cuisine and let me tell you, there is not orange chicken in sight. The Chinese vases and paintings of the East, are in a similar way a false depiction of the culture they seek to represent, but more so a reflection of the culture, which has a want for them.
            We learned that in China, many Aesthetics had objects in their homes like vases, and jars with blue glaze painting, that were simply manufactured to be exported out of the country, or for tourists to purchase. This system is still alive and well today. I remember being in India near the Taj Mahal and every single vendor wanted to sell me something made out of marble. “The Same Real Marble Used in the Taj Mahal,” many shouted. I bought a tiny jewelry holder, and paid a respectful amount for it, and still today, I look at it and I’m not even sure if it is marble! However the experience of being able to buy a small piece of marble near the majestic Taj Mahal made me feel truly special, and I still use that jewelry dish to this day.
            That’s what I mean by the object being a reflection of the culture that purchased it. Not the one that bought it. It is a true reflection of the people who had a particular taste for Oriental rooms and china vases. These objects are their idea of “The East” manifested into the decorative arts. If you divorce the idea of being culturally accurate, from being aesthetically pleasing, you’re left with Orientalism- a funny term that captures a certain style of art that Europeans have preferred to decorate their homes and gallery walls with for a tremendously long period of time. 





Links to Images:









            




           

                                                                        DGR, Monna Rosa, 1862